Updated
|
Is a Michigan Teacher Being Punished for Defending Homosexuals?
Jay McDowell, a public school teacher in Howell, evicted a student for making anti-homosexual comments, but now the instructor faces suspension. Learn about the national controversy that involves this local Michigan teacher.

Most educators and parents would agree that school needs to be a safe place if children are to successfully learn. However, what that safe place looks like has become a topic of controversy for one Michigan school district. On the one hand, a teacher is being applauded for standing up for homosexual students. On the other hand, that same teacher is being accused of bullying students who voiced their own views on anti-homosexuality based on their religion. Which stand is correct? The verdict is still out.

In 2026, debates surrounding student speech, religious expression, LGBTQ+ protections, and school safety policies continue to play out in school districts across the country. Public schools are still navigating how to balance student rights in public school with anti-bullying policies and inclusive learning environments.

The Howell Controversy

In a high school about 45 miles northwest of Detroit, a school teacher asked one of his economics students to remove a belt buckle that featured the Confederate flag. The teacher, Jay McDowell, explained that the symbol could be offensive to some of the students in the class. The student readily complied with the request, but the exchange sparked a discussion among other students and the teacher that resulted in two students being asked to leave the classroom.

The first student, 16-year-old Daniel Glowacki, asked McDowell to explain the difference between the Confederate flag and the rainbow flag that serves as a symbol of pride for the gay community. At the time, McDowell was

. . .read more

Bribing Students to Get Good Grades: The Debate

Updated
|
Bribing Students to Get Good Grades: The Debate
This piece explores the controversial practice of offering monetary rewards to students for good grades. It examines studies conducted in various cities, discussing the effectiveness of such programs and the ethical concerns they raise. The article presents arguments from both supporters and critics of this approach to student motivation.

Students are often given rewards by parents when they bring home a sound report card. High school students who excel in academics, sports or other activities are often given monetary incentives to attend particular colleges through scholarships. Why not pay students in primary and secondary schools for making the grade as well?

Studies have recently been conducted to determine whether monetary rewards by the school district would motivate at-risk students to achieve better in school. While the results of these studies have been mixed, the debate over the idea is unmistakable. Although some believe that any method of enticing kids to perform well in school is fair game, others see paying cash for grades as an unnecessary way to encourage students to do what they should already be achieving. Who's right? Let's take a look at both sides of the debate to see.

The Four-City Study

Harvard economist Roland Frye recently conducted a test to find out if offering students monetary rewards for performing well in school could bring up scores on standardized tests. Frye's research results were published in Time last spring. The study looked at schools in four major cities across the United States: Chicago, Dallas, Washington, and New York.

In New York, fourth through seventh-grade students were paid for their grades on tests. In Chicago, ninth-grade kids were paid for the grades on their report cards. In Washington, middle schoolers earned money based on five different metrics, including

. . .read more

Yale Pays For College For Public School Grads

Updated
|
Yale Pays For College For Public School Grads
Public school graduates in New Haven can now go to college on Yale’s dime. Learn more about the New Haven Promise that could spark similar programs across the country.

The New Haven public school system, like others across the country, is dealing with a high drop-out rate that leaves many students unable to climb out of their current poverty trap. To help combat the problem in this New England state, Yale University has pledged a large amount of money over the next four years to help high school students in Connecticut go to college without worry over how bills will be paid. Yale has recently announced the New Haven Promise. This new program will allow public high school graduates in Connecticut the opportunity to go to college for free if they qualify for admission and keep their grades up during college.

This video explains how financial aid works at Yale University.

New Haven Promise

New Haven Promise is a scholarship and support program created by the city of New Haven and Yale University. It is designed to reduce the public school drop-out rate by allowing many more New Haven students to attend college.

According to the New Haven Promise website, the organization hopes to accomplish the following:

The organization wants to be the catalyst that reduces not only drop-out rates but poverty, crime, and incarceration rates in New Haven

. . .read more

Do Superintendents Need Education Backgrounds? The Fiery Debate

Updated
|
Do Superintendents Need Education Backgrounds? The Fiery Debate
Today’s superintendents come from a variety of industries, ranging from business to politics. However, should superintendents have education backgrounds? Learn more about the controversial debate.

Most individuals appointed as superintendents of school districts have a background in public education. However, some districts have found that sound managerial experience in the business sector can be just as advantageous – and sometimes more so – than those with a strict background in teaching.

On the other hand, superintendents that come straight from the business world may lack the educational knowledge necessary to properly lead a district in the best interests of the students. Which philosophy is correct? According to two major school districts currently involved in this very debate, the answer isn't terribly clear.

Management Experience vs. Education Training

According to a report in Bloomberg Business Week, New York is one city that appears to put sound managerial experience over an education background when it comes to choosing a superintendent for the nation's largest school district.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg came into the political arena with no experience in government and is now serving his third term as mayor. His appointments of New York schools chancellors also seem to reflect his commitment to finding individuals with business and managerial experience to lead the district.

This video outlines the qualifications for a school superintendent position.

Bloomberg's recent chancellor appointment, Cathie Black, "seems to be a continuation of Mayor Bloomberg's predisposition toward choosing people that he views as good managers regardless of their expertise in education," Aaron Pallas, a professor at Columbia University's

. . .read more

Public School Choice: Dispatches from LAUSD's Reform

Updated
|
Public School Choice: Dispatches from LAUSD's Reform
The LA Unified School District is hoping that the Public School Choice reform can turnaround ailing schools. How well is it working thus far?

What do you do with a school that consistently fails to maintain quality standards in educating students? Some school districts might opt to pull funding or close the school down completely. However, Los Angeles Unified School District launched a very different idea through Public School Choice reform, which allowed other educational entities to take over struggling schools in an effort to produce institutions that achieved stronger academic results through innovation and autonomy.

Schools that did not make the grade each year were put on the eligibility list for Public School Choice reform. At that time, nonprofits, teachers, or charter operators could apply to revamp struggling campuses. These entities could choose to operate separately from the school district, or they could work within district guidelines to produce a brand-new educational system specifically geared to that school and the children who attend.

While the original initiative has changed over time, Los Angeles Unified School District still describes the Public School Choice initiative as part of its work with schools and partners. The Intercultural Development Research Association describes school choice as a concept that can include controlled choice plans within a single public school district, interdistrict and statewide public school plans, and voucher plans that include private schools.

For additional background, parents can also read Public School Choice, Magnet Programs & Charter Options: What’s Best?.

Why Public Choice?

According to the original Public School Review article, the Public School Choice motion was designed to

. . .read more

Recent Articles

How to Read a School Improvement Plan Before Choosing a School
How to Read a School Improvement Plan Before Choosing a School
Learn how to read a school improvement plan, identify meaningful goals, and evaluate whether a school's improvement efforts align with your child's educational needs.
Should You Move for a Better Public School? A Cost vs. Benefit Analysis
Should You Move for a Better Public School? A Cost vs. Benefit Analysis
Considering a move to a better public school? Explore the financial, academic, and lifestyle tradeoffs before making one of your family's biggest decisions.
When a Higher-Rated School Isn't the Better Fit
When a Higher-Rated School Isn't the Better Fit
Discover why the highest-rated public school may not always be the best choice and learn how to evaluate schools based on your child's unique needs.