Saying Ni Hao to Chinese Charter Schools

This article has been updated to reflect 2026 data and recent developments.

Although the civil rights movement played a pivotal role in this nation's history, the subject has not always received sustained attention in primary and secondary schools. However, Mississippi changed that trend by requiring civil rights lessons for all public schools, grades K-12. The lessons were signed into law by Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, with implementation going into effect for the 2011-2012 academic year. The curriculum was delayed so that it could be fit into a full revision of the state's social studies framework.

In 2026, civil rights remains a distinct strand in Mississippi's current social studies standards. The Mississippi Department of Education states that the 2022 Mississippi College and Career Readiness Standards for Social Studies are currently used statewide. The standards identify five essential content strands, including Civil Rights, that remain integrated throughout K-12 social studies courses.

The First to Require Civil Rights Curriculum

Mississippi officials believed they might be the first state to implement such a requirement. Students would answer civil rights questions on state assessment exams necessary for graduation from high school. While this addition ensured civil rights would be taught in schools, how the lessons were taught would in large part be up to individual teachers.

Chauncey Spears, who worked in the Mississippi Department of Education's curriculum and instruction office, said school districts could tailor textbooks and other course materials to match what would be taught. Spears added that some

School buses have traditionally been the transportation of choice for public school students across the country. These big yellow vehicles have become a mainstay in both urban and suburban communities, offering students access to school campuses that might have difficulty getting to and from school otherwise. However, budget cuts, rising gas prices, and concerns over their environmental impact have forced many school districts to take another look at the diesel-run buses that dominate most school districts today. In some cases, propane buses are providing a cheaper and more environmentally friendly option.

This video looks at propane-powered school buses.

The Cost of Diesel

The expense of running children to and from school on diesel buses is not a small one by any means. According to a report in the Christian Science Monitor/2), it is estimated that more than 25 million children ride the bus to school each day. In some areas, year-round schooling means no respite from gas bills over the summer months. As the number of children requiring bus transportation remains relatively consistent, the cost of fuel does not.

The National Association for Fuel Transportation estimated that in some areas two years ago, the cost of fuel shot up from $1.95 per gallon to more than $4 per gallon during a single academic year. A 100% increase was extremely tough on many school districts that were already feeling the budget

Drug testing has been commonplace in professions that require critical decision-making skills, ranging from police officers to civil servants. A growing number of individuals also believe that the people who spend the most time with our children should also be subject to random testing of this kind. Teachers have come under the gun in recent years over the issue of random drug testing. While some parents and education experts believe random testing is necessary to keep schools safe, teachers believe these tests violate their privacy rights. Public school teachers are not universally required to undergo drug testing in every state. No federal mandate requires drug testing for teachers, and no state laws specifically mandate it for all teachers across the United States. However, drug testing policies vary significantly by state and individual school districts.

Drug testing is one part of these policies, and it serves a necessary role in a drug-free work culture. And because of the negative impact drug use can have, especially in safety-sensitive industries, companies should consider the benefits of drug testing in the workplace when developing new safety policies. Source: PharmaChek

Why Drug Testing?

In numerous states, questions have arisen over whether teachers in public schools should undergo random drug testing as a part of their employment. The practice is shared with other professionals, and some believe teachers fall into a similar category because they work directly with students all day. They argue that teachers who fail random drug tests

A troubling report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that individuals with a history of sexual misconduct were working in some neighborhood schools. Even more concerning, some were able to obtain new teaching or staff positions after behaving inappropriately toward children in other school districts. The report identified numerous breakdowns in hiring practices that allowed these individuals back into schools because of incomplete background checks, poor record sharing, and administrative loopholes.

More than a decade later, the issue remains an important school safety concern. While states have strengthened hiring laws and school districts have improved screening procedures, experts agree that vigilance remains essential. Schools today are expected to conduct far more comprehensive background investigations than they did when the original GAO report was released, but inconsistencies between states and districts still exist.

Parents who want to better understand educator screening practices can also read Public School Review's guide to Should Schools Conduct Background Checks on Teachers?.

The GAO Report

The original report released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office examined 15 case studies involving public schools that employed individuals with troubling histories. According to the investigation, 11 of the employees had previously engaged in inappropriate sexual conduct involving children. In six of those cases, the individuals went on to abuse children again after obtaining employment in another school district.

The report was prepared in response to growing concerns about weaknesses in school hiring practices and followed earlier federal research highlighting educator sexual misconduct as