Public School Choice, Magnet Programs & Charter Options — What’s Best?

Introduction
In 2025, public schools face unprecedented challenges, including post-pandemic learning recovery, rising mental-health concerns and equity gaps. Support services in public schools—such as tutoring, counselling and comprehensive student-assistance programs—are more critical than ever. This article examines the role of support services in public schools, outlines best practices and offers guidance for parents, educators and students seeking to understand how these supports help achieve stronger outcomes.

1. Defining Support Services in Public Schools
Support services in public schools typically refer to three core domains: academic support (tutoring and supplemental instruction), personal-social/emotional support (counselling, wellness programmes) and wrap-around or whole-child services (mentoring, family engagement and community partnerships).

• Tutoring and academic intervention services help students who are behind or need enrichment.

• Counselling and wellness services address mental-health, behavioural or adjustment issues.

• Wrap-around supports linking students with mentoring, family outreach or external agencies.
  For many school districts, these support services act together to help students remain engaged, thrive academically and develop resilience.

2. Why Support Services Matter in Public Schools
2.1 Addressing Learning Loss and Academic Gaps
The interruption of schooling caused by COVID-19 and other disruptions has increased demand for high-quality tutoring and academic support. Studies show that targeted tutoring and supplemental instruction are effective means of helping students catch up. For example, a study emphasised the benefits of one-on-one tutoring for children with special educational needs.
2.2 Supporting Mental Health and Emotional Well-being
Counselling

The Impact of Social Media on Students

In the past decade, social media has become deeply woven into students’ everyday lives, both inside and outside the classroom. As we move into 2025, understanding the impact of social media on students—academically, socially and psychologically—is essential for parents, educators and school leaders. This article updates the original analysis with current data, evolving policies and expert commentary, while retaining the previous structure for clarity and continuity.

Introduction

The term “social media” now covers everything from short-form video apps like TikTok, to image-sharing networks such as Instagram, to collaborative platforms used by students and schools. The latest estimates show approximately 5.24 billion people worldwide are active on social media in 2025, up 4.1 % from the previous year.
For students, social media represents both potential advantages (such as connected learning and peer collaboration) and clear risks (including distraction, mental-health concerns and reduced focus).
The remainder of this article explores the current state of social media use among students, its academic implications, behavioural and mental-health effects, evolving school policies, strategies for positive use, and recommendations for families and educators.

Current Usage Patterns

Recent studies indicate that social media usage remains high among young people and students. Global figures show that 63.9 % of the world’s population uses social media, with an average daily time of about 2 hours 21 minutes as of February 2025. Smart Insights
For school-age students, access to digital devices is nearly universal. For example,

The Push for Career and Technical Education (CTE)

In recent years, interest in career and technical education (CTE) has surged as parents, students and educators seek more relevant pathways to careers and post-secondary success. This article updates the 2023 perspective with fresh data, 2025-era policy developments, tuition realities and real-world examples of how CTE is evolving in U.S. schools.

1. Why CTE Is Back in the Spotlight

Career and Technical Education (CTE) offers a strategic bridge between academic learning and in-demand careers. In February 2025, the U.S. Department of Education reaffirmed its commitment to CTE during the annual Career and Technical Education Month, emphasizing renewed funding and national priority. White House
Several factors are driving this renewed focus:

• Workforce demands: Employers face skilled-labor shortages and seek graduates who can enter the job market with both technical skills and academic literacy.

• Diversity of student goals: More students and families recognise that a four-year college is not the only route to stable employment; CTE offers viable alternatives.

• Policy momentum: Recent legislation and state actions are providing incentives and accountability for CTE programs.

• Equity and access concerns: CTE is increasingly framed as a tool for widening opportunity to students who may not otherwise pursue traditional college paths.

2. 2025 Data Snapshot for U.S. CTE

According to the latest data by the National Center

School Lunch Programs: Past and Present

Introduction
School lunch programs have become a cornerstone of U.S. public education, bridging nutrition and learning for millions of students each day. As of 2025, understanding the evolution of these initiatives—how they began, how they’ve changed, and where they stand now—remains critical for parents, educators and policymakers alike. This article revisits the history of school lunch programs, examines current policy and participation data, and offers a forward-looking view of how they shape the educational environment.

1. Origins of School Lunch Programs
The federal school lunch program in the United States was formalised with the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) under the National School Lunch Act of 1946, with the goal of providing “nutritious meals” in public and non-profit private schools. fns.usda.gov Over subsequent decades, the program expanded and adapted in response to shifts in child nutrition science, federal funding, and socio-economic trends.

Earlier iterations emphasised calorie adequacy and food security; by the early 21st century, concerns about childhood obesity and diet quality drove changes in meal standards and procurement practices. For example, the federal rules governing school meals were significantly updated to align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020–2025. This historical foundation sets the stage for how school lunch programs function today.

2. Participation and Reach in 2025
Participation remains large-scale: according to the Food Research & Action Center (FRAC), nearly 29.4 million children participated in the NSLP on a typical day in the 2023–24