This article has been updated to reflect 2026 data and recent developments.
Ever since the Internet has come into the public school classroom, filters have been used to keep inappropriate and obscene information and pictures away from students. However, the ACLU has been alerted to the fact that pornography isn't the only thing not making it into public school classrooms today. Many schools across the country have used their filtering tools to weed out information for LGBT students, even when the websites in question do not fall into the pornographic or inappropriate category. What's worse is that some of these same schools have allowed anti-gay websites to be accessed on campus. Internet filtering remains relevant in 2026 as schools balance access to online educational resources with digital safety.
What's In and What's Out
The problem came to the attention of the ACLU a few years ago when a high school student in Tennessee was searching for information about scholarships for gay and lesbian students. The student was unable to access any of the websites that provided such information, according to a report on Digital Life. However, the student did discover websites advocating that gay and lesbian behavior can be reformed or overcome. The student notified the ACLU about the issue, and the ACLU sued the school and several others in Tennessee with similar policies.
On their website, the ACLU asserts that blocking LGBT content while allowing opposing viewpoints can violate students' First Amendment rights to free speech. They have also argued that such filtering can violate the Equal Access Act, which requires equal access to school resources for all extracurricular clubs, including gay-straight alliances and LGBT support groups. The ACLU has continued to address Internet filtering to ensure gay and lesbian students have the support and access they need, no matter where they live and go to school.
Jay Kaplan, ACLU of Michigan LGBT Project staff attorney, told MSNBC, "The use of Internet filtering tools to censor websites that advocate for the fair treatment of LGBT people is wrong and illegal. Many of these websites provide much-needed support and resources for LGBT youth during a critical time of their lives. By blocking LGBT websites, schools are sending a terrible message to students that LGBT voices are to be ignored and silenced."
Don't Filter Me
As a response to the filtering issue that appeared to be a problem in many schools, the ACLU launched the "Don't Filter Me" campaign in an effort to identify more schools using filtering to censor pro-gay websites. The program became a reality when the Yale Law School LGBT Litigation Clinic contacted the ACLU about helping them with their LGBT Project. With the help of Yale, a YouTube video was published encouraging students and others to report additional incidences of discrimination through Internet filtering. The ACLU later reported that filtering software companies changed their products in response to complaints raised through the initiative.
Shortly after the video was posted, the ACLU reported on Digital Life that they sent letters to schools in Michigan, Texas, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, demanding they stop censorship of content geared toward LGBT students. The ACLU also provided an online form with a list of websites and invitations for students to try to access them while on campus. If access was denied, the ACLU wanted to know which websites were censored, with screen captures, when possible.
Vineland High School the First in New Jersey to Lift Ban
Students and staff who had complained about the filter used at Vineland High School in New Jersey were happy to discover the school voluntarily removed the filter in response to the complaints they received. No one knows exactly how long the filter was in place, but it even kept students from researching important gay and lesbian figures in the state's history. The filter was removed on March 31, days after the ACLU had filed an Open Public Records Act to receive documents related to the matter, according to a report at New Jersey Newsroom.
The Vineland student that brought the filter to the attention of the ACLU was Justin Rodriguez. Rodriguez said that he had voiced his concern about the filter to school administrators multiple times, but had never received a response. Rodriguez was contacted by the ACLU after filling out the form on the "Don’t Filter Me" website. The day after the filter was removed, Rodriguez was called into the vice principal's office, where he was alerted to the change.
This video from CNN reports on schools that are banning discussion of LGBT topics.
Prince William Schools Considering the Matter
Prince William schools in Virginia were also notified by the ACLU letter to remove similar filters. According to the ACLU, the schools filtered out websites like Gay Lesbian and Straight Information Network, It Gets Better and Day of Silence. However, the school's computer system did allow access to websites that advocated converting from a gay to a straight lifestyle, such as People Can Change and Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays.
The Prince William schools were in a quandary, since the filters used in the high schools were the same tools used in elementary schools. According to an article at the Washington Post, a spokesman for the school said the district had received the ACLU's letter and was reviewing the request, as well as the requirements for filtering imposed by the federal Children's Internet Protection Act and the Virginia code.
Joshua Block, staff attorney with the ACLU LGBT Project summed it up with these words, "There is no legitimate reason why any public school should be using an anti-LGBT filter…These filters are designed to discriminate and are programmed specifically to target LGBT-related content that would not otherwise be blocked as sexually explicit or inappropriate."
The ACLU continues its work against discriminatory practices in schools through the use of Internet filtering. Students who experience such discrimination can contact the ACLU, which continues to provide information about anti-LGBTQ web filtering and student speech and privacy rights. In 2026, Public School Review also examines related issues involving student data, technology and privacy.
