School Discipline Policies

How Public Schools Prepare Students for College: Best Practices

Understanding how public schools prepare students for college is essential for families evaluating academic pathways and long-term outcomes. Across the United States, districts continue to expand college-readiness initiatives that blend rigorous coursework, structured advising, workforce exploration, and personalized support. In 2025, many public school systems are refining these strategies to address rising expectations for postsecondary success. This article explains how public schools prepare students for college, highlights best practices, and outlines what families should look for when comparing schools.

Why College Readiness in Public Schools Matters

Public schools serve the majority of American students, which makes effective college preparation a national priority. For families, understanding how public schools prepare students for college provides insight into curriculum quality, teacher expertise, counseling access, and the real-world opportunities available during the high school years.

Several factors drive the need for strong college-readiness systems. College admissions have become more competitive, financial aid rules evolve each year, and students face increasing pressure to build authentic academic and extracurricular portfolios. Schools that understand how public schools prepare students for college often integrate academic, social-emotional, and logistical support.

Key drivers include:

• Rising expectations for advanced coursework

• Demand for dual-enrollment access

• Need for earlier counseling and planning

• Expansion of dir="ltr" style="list-style-type: disc; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color:

Discipline, Attendance & Graduation Rates in U.S. Public Schools: 2025 Update

Understanding the health of public school education requires tracking key indicators such as student discipline, attendance and graduation rates. For parents, educators and students alike, these metrics provide insight into school climate, student engagement and overall system performance. This article presents the latest data (2023–25) for public schools in the United States, highlights trends, discusses implications and offers expert commentary.

1. Graduation Rates: A Strong Foundation with Lingering Gaps

One of the most encouraging signals in U.S. public school education is the consistent rise in on-time graduation. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), in the school year 2021–22 the adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR) for public high school students reached 87 percent, up seven percentage points from a decade earlier. National Center for Education Statistics

Key breakdowns

• Asian/Pacific Islander students: ~94 percent

• White students: ~90 percent

• Hispanic students: ~83 percent

• Black students: ~81 percent

• American Indian/Alaska Native: ~74 percent

What this means

Public school systems are doing better in retaining, supporting and graduating students within four years. That gives parents and students greater confidence in the value of a diploma. But the

Understanding Public School Lotteries, Magnet Programs and Dual-Language Schools

When families explore public-school options beyond their neighborhood zone, three major pathways often appear: lotteries, magnet programs and dual-language schools. Although each mechanism has its own logic, they share a common aim: offering additional choice, access and educational enrichment within the public-school system. This article—current for 2025—explains how each works, what parents and students should know, and how to navigate the process effectively.

1. What is a public school lottery?

Why a lottery?

When demand for a certain program or school exceeds available seats, many school districts resort to a lottery system to allocate spots fairly and transparently. As one guide explains: “A school lottery is a process that districts use when more students apply for a program than there are available seats.”

The lottery serves multiple functions:

• It facilitates school-choice options within the public system (rather than strictly attending one’s zoned school).

• It helps districts manage capacity, maintain demographic balance and meet equity goals.

• It ensures the allocation process is not purely first-come, first-served (which may disadvantage families with fewer resources).

How does the lottery process work?

While specifics differ by district, most lotteries follow a similar outline:

1. Families submit an application listing one or several preferred schools/programs.

It is a story that is all too often in the news: A child is subjected to torturous cyberbullying by his or her peers via social media. Threatening messages sent on Facebook, humiliating comments about their appearance on Twitter, and other such nonsense drives the student to lash out, possibly hurting themselves, their peers, or both.

Schools no doubt serve a protective function and are charged with ensuring students have access to a free, appropriate education in an environment that is safe, secure, and nurturing. To help achieve that end, some states are taking strong measures to bolster the authority and power of school districts with regard to investigating instances of bullying, even if such negative behaviors do not occur on school property or within the bounds of the school day.

The Illinois Law

In an attempt to curb cyberbullying behaviors, the Illinois General Assembly passed a law, enacted January 1st of this year, that allows public school districts to demand access to students’ personal social media accounts if the student is suspected of violating school rules.

A letter sent home to parents in Triad Community Schools in Illinois, obtained by Motherboard, outlines the new policy:

“School authorities may require a student or his or her parent/guardian to provide a password or other related account information in order to gain access to his/her account profile on a social networking website if school authorities have reasonable cause to believe

According to a 2014 report by the U.S. Department of Education’s Civil Rights Office, widespread racial disparities exist in how schoolchildren are punished. The longitudinal study looked at data from the past 15 years and found that minority students face a disproportional number of disciplinary actions in schools across the country, from those in affluent suburban neighborhoods to those in the poorest urban areas.

These disparities have been known for some time in middle and high schools. However, this report reveals that unfair discipline procedures begin as early as preschool. The data, which was collected from 97,000 public schools across the country, paints a troubling picture:

• Black and Latino students are consistently punished more severely than white students for the same infractions.
• Nearly 50 percent of preschool children suspended multiple times are black, yet black children represent less than one-fifth of the preschool population.
• Black students are far more likely to be referred to law enforcement or arrested for a school-based offense than white students or other students of color.
• Black girls are suspended much more than girls of any other race.
• Students with disabilities, who represent only 12 percent of the public school population, account for almost 60 percent of students placed in seclusion.

Zero-Tolerance Policies

Many students suspended or placed in involuntary seclusion are put there because of the zero-tolerance policies that schools have put in place over the last two decades. Zero-tolerance policies began initially as a response to major