Austin School District Offers Tracking Program to Prevent Truancy

This article has been updated to reflect 2026 data and recent developments.

Student truancy is a problem for many school districts across the country, impacting student performance and even the amount of funding schools receive. Some schools in Texas thought they had found a way to address the problem directly in 2012, by requiring students to wear special badges that allowed school administrators to monitor their whereabouts. While school officials called the new tracking cards a boon to student safety and attendance, some parents and students voiced concern over whether schools were going too far in violating student privacy.

Monitoring Programs Introduced in San Antonio, Austin

The Huffington Post reported in 2012 that the Northside Independent School District in San Antonio had distributed the special ID cards to all of its students as part of a pilot program dubbed the “Student Locator Project.” The identification cards contained a microchip that allowed teachers and staff to track students while they were on school property. At the time, the project was underway at two Northside schools: Jay High School and Jones Middle School. The program impacted around 4,200 students between the two schools.

The new tags used radio frequency identification technology (RFID) for the tracking mechanism. In a notice sent out to parents, district officials stated the RFID tags would be used to make schools safer, identify the location of students, and increase school revenue. The cards were to be used as general student identification cards as

The District of Columbia is a popular place for charter schools, with these institutions taking in about 41 percent of the city’s public school students. However, that percentage appears to be a tenuous one, as reports of high numbers of expulsions have recently begun to surface. With expulsion rates significantly higher than the rest of D.C. public schools, some educators in the city have begun to question the motives behind the actions. And while charter schools are disputing some of the data, no one seems to know for sure exactly how many students are kicked out of the city’s charter schools once they enroll.

Numbers are In, Concerns are Raised

The Washington Post recently conducted an in-depth piece on how expulsion rates at D.C. charter schools compared with the rates of other public schools across the city. The report was based on data released by the D.C. Public Charter School Board, which showed charter students were expelled at rates as high as eight percent in some charter schools. Charter schools expelled approximately 72 students for every 10,000 in the schools. At the same time, other public schools in the city expelled one student for every 10,000.

Not all of the charter schools in D.C. expelled students, leaving those that did with even higher percentages. Another Washington Post article reported that Friendship Collegiate Academy-Woodson, a charter high school, expelled eight percent of its student body during the 2010-2011 school year. In addition,

Drug testing has become a common procedure in some areas of society, from teachers and athletes to professionals in a wide range of industries. More recently, the question of drug testing for students has been raised, as some schools have begun to institute random drug testing in high schools and even middle schools. Is drug testing an effective way to keep students “clean” or is it a blatant violation of students’ privacy rights? The answer to that question may depend on who you ask.

An Overview of Drug Testing

Drug testing can be done through a variety of methods, using samples that include urine or a few strands of hair. Common drugs tested for include marijuana, cocaine, steroids, opiates and amphetamines. Alcohol is not a substance that can be detected using standard drug testing procedures, since the substance does not stay in the body long enough to show up in test results. Current use of alcohol can be tested by breathalyzers and other testing methods.

Drug testing can be performed as a standard procedure, such as prior to hiring an applicant for a job. Some schools drug test teachers and have found positive results. Testing can also be done on an individual if substance use is suspected, due to suspicious behavior or actions of the individual. Another option is random testing, which can be done on any individual at any time, without warning. It is the random testing approach that has typically come under fire

As schools look at various options to improve school and student performance, one variable consistently comes to the forefront – money. While many educators assert that bigger budgets could solve many of the problems in education today, politicians at all levels agree that more money is probably not needed in the foreseeable future for most school districts across the country. In place of more funding, some areas are now looking at different ways to allocate the money that is currently available. Student-based funding is the new buzzword for school districts interested in getting the money to the schools and students who need it most. Now, Georgia is joining the student-based funding bandwagon.

What is Student-Based Funding?

Student-based funding is a method of allotting funding to school districts and even individual schools based on the needs of individual students. This contrasts with traditional school funding determined by educational programs, creating an average amount spent on every student within a given district. Proponents of student-based funding argue that traditional funding results in disparities throughout the educational system, as schools with high-need students are left wanting resources. Student-based funding aims to reduce those disparities without needing additional money, which educators regularly champion.

This video offers a discussion of student-based funding.

According to the Annenberg Institute for School Reform website, student-based funding begins by assigning specific weights to each type of student. The weights are measured by the cost

The New Year may see more than the return to school for New York City’s students. It may also usher in a school bus strike that threatens to leave thousands of New York students without transportation to and from every day. While a school bus strike is far from imminent, according to most accounts, concerns over a strike have continued to grow throughout the city as parents, students, and city officials wait to see how the rising conflict will shake out.

City Bids Spark Strike Threats

The city’s decision to solicit bids for lower contract rates from bus companies is at the core of the controversy. The bids were launched at the impending termination of the current contract with school bus drivers, which is scheduled to expire in 2013. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg told CBS New York and other media channels the bids were necessary to reduce transportation costs for the school system. However, current bus drivers said the city is not promising to protect the jobs of current drivers based on seniority as it goes through the process of cutting costs.

CBS New York reports that New York City currently spends around $1 billion on the transportation of around 152,000 students daily. That number had increased significantly over the last three decades when the cost of bussing students was around $7.1 million. The 1,100 busses that currently run throughout the city are operated by 52 private companies, according to the New