Students Protest Standardized Tests

Students Protest Standardized Tests
With the standardized test season approaching, we look at recent protests of the tests by some students and school districts.

‘Tis the season for standardized testing at public schools across the country, as school districts gear up for statewide testing that provides a glimpse into how and what students are learning. The season is not typically met with happy anticipation by most students and teachers; in fact, the mood may better be described as anxiety and even trepidation. In a few areas of the nation, students and teachers are taking matters into their own hands, organizing boycotts of tests that some say are a waste of valuable instruction hours and inaccurate gauge of how well schools are teaching and students are learning.

Portland Opts Out

With the Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS) examinations looming in Portland, some students have decided that enough is enough when it comes to the statewide testing process. Members of the Portland Student Union have launched an opt-out campaign to protest the examinations with a district-wide boycott by students. According to U.S. News and World Report, members of the student union are encouraging other students to boycott the examinations, by opting out on test days.

This video reports the situation with Portland students protesting standardized tests.

The Washington Post reports that ideas of the boycott began to circulate when two different Portland Student Unions got together and realized they shared a common concern involving the state examinations. The students involved in the unions began educating themselves on the impact a boycott of the testing might have on the schools involved. The students also familiarized themselves with the opt-out process, in order to let other students know how to officially remove themselves from the standardized tests.

“We are choosing to opt-out of the OAKS tests as they are tests that directly waste class time, and are used as a form of evaluation of our schools,” the group organizing the opt-out was quoted as saying in U.S. News. The group compared OAKS to other standardized testing that provided the same purpose for assessing student learning, but also provided benefits to students, such as college entrance examinations. The group stated, “These tests are beneficial to students in comparison to the OAKS test that literally has zero benefit to students.”

State Testing Requirements

According to Oregon Live, the state mandates testing for students every year from third grade through eighth grade. The state also tests students in 11th grade, and scores from those exams are used to test student proficiency for graduation from high school. The only exemptions allowed for opt-outs currently include religious or disability-related to reasons. Opt-outs require a parent’s written authorization.

With standardized testing currently used in Oregon as a means of assessing proficiency prior to graduation, some students, parents, and teachers have expressed concern that a widespread boycott of the tests could impact the ability of some students to graduate from high school on time. However, the student union asserts that there are many other ways for students to demonstrate proficiency in core subjects, including Advanced Placement examinations and college exams like the ACT and SAT. Because science is not a requirement for graduation in Oregon, students would also not need standardized testing in this area to meet graduation proficiency.

Portland Follows on Heels of Seattle Boycott

Portland schools are not the first to propose a boycott of standardized testing this year. U.S. News also reports that teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle recently announced they would not be administering Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) testing to their students this year. The boycott was voted on unanimously by teachers at the school, who claim the tests are wasting valuable class time, as well as staffing resources and money.

Here is a report on the Seattle situation.

“We at Garfield are not against accountability or demonstrating student progress,” Garfield teacher Jesse Hagopian was quoted as saying at U.S. News. “We do insist on a form of assessment relevant to what we’re teaching in the classroom. Some of my colleagues would propose replacing the MAP with a test that is aligned to our curriculum.”

MAP testing is done multiple times throughout the year, in order for teachers to gauge the academic progress of students. While these exams are not the state-mandated, high-stakes testing that is getting the attention in Portland, the teachers could face disciplinary action from the school district for their boycott. However, the teachers have garnered extensive support from students, parents, and educators in Seattle and across the country.

The Need for Testing

While many complain about the state of standardized testing today, others argue that while the system is far from perfect, it is better than no assessment of school and student performance whatsoever. Portland Public Schools recently posted a blog on their website titled, “Standardized Tests are a Key Learning Tool.” The article points out that the OAKS tests show how well students have learned what they need to in each core subject and how well Portland schools are addressing the needs of students.

The blog also makes note of the importance of the OAKS exams because they are an effective way to objectively measure standards across multiple schools. The OAKS tests are just one tool teachers use to assess how well students are learning the subject material.

In this video, John Oliver explains the issue of standardized tests.

The article also seems to draw a line in the sand for students contemplating participation in the proposed boycott. The website warns that students are required by law to take the examinations unless they qualify for an exemption. It also reminds students that they must have parental permission to opt-out of examinations.

With the battle lines drawn, it is now anybody’s guess whether students will follow through with their boycott, and what schools will do if the boycott results in the impact students are hoping for.

Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview

Additional Resources [+]
comments powered by Disqus

Recent Articles

Busing and Desegregation: Understanding the Link
Busing and Desegregation: Understanding the Link
What happens when a school district stops busing students? Could segregation once again be a reality for public school districts? Wake County in North Carolina is testing the segregation waters with its decision to stop busing students in their district.
Surveillance Cameras: Violation of Rights or Improved Security?
Surveillance Cameras: Violation of Rights or Improved Security?
A school district in Virginia has given the green light to schools that want to install surveillance cameras in common areas like cafeterias and hallways. We’ll look at whether this is a violation of student privacy or the best way to keep order in schools.
Teaching in Contemporary Times
March 04, 2024
Teaching in Contemporary Times
We explore why individuals choose teaching, illuminating intrinsic motivations, the influence of role models, the pursuit of lifelong learning, and the aspiration to impact society.

Public School Policies

A Relevant History of Public Education in the United States
A Relevant History of Public Education in the United States
An In-Depth Look at Common Core – What’s Working and What Isn’t?
An In-Depth Look at Common Core – What’s Working and What Isn’t?
Do Lotteries Really Benefit Public Schools?  The Answer is Hazy
Do Lotteries Really Benefit Public Schools? The Answer is Hazy
More Articles
Read more articles (83)
School Controversies (48)