Charter schools have become one of the most discussed alternatives to traditional public schools, but does the reality of charter school performance match the hype? While charter schools often receive positive media attention and make bold claims about student achievement, research continues to show that outcomes vary widely from school to school. Some charter schools outperform nearby public schools, some perform similarly, and others struggle to meet academic expectations.
In a closer examination, charter schools, as explained by the National Education Association, are publicly funded institutions that operate under their own standards of conduct and curriculum outside the realm of local public school districts. Although these institutions are funded by tax dollars, charter schools are generally given greater flexibility to establish their own methods of operation, similar to how many private schools design their instructional and organizational practices. While some state statutes, regulations, and rules still apply, charter schools are typically governed by an independent board under the terms of their charter.
The original impetus for the creation of charter schools was to increase competition for students, giving parents more choices in where their children attend school. It was also theorized that increased competition between public and charter schools would encourage stronger educational programs across both sectors.
Parents comparing different educational options may also find Public School Review's guide to Public vs. Charter vs. Magnet School: Which Is Best? helpful for understanding the similarities and differences among today's school choice options.
