Evaluating Public Schools

How Public Schools Are Responding to Chronic Absenteeism Post-Pandemic

Chronic absenteeism—typically defined as missing 10% or more of school days—has emerged as one of the most persistent challenges for public schools in the post-pandemic era. After spiking during COVID-19, rates have remained elevated, prompting school districts nationwide to renew strategies to reengage students.

This article examines how public schools are confronting chronic absenteeism today: the strategies in use, early outcomes, remaining obstacles, and promising innovations to watch.

The Post-Pandemic Landscape: Why Schools Are Still Wrestling With Absences Elevated Rates and Uneven Recovery

• In the 2024–25 school year, chronic absenteeism in many districts remained above pre-pandemic levels, with some urban districts reporting 30% or more of students missing 10%+ of days. RAND Corporation

• According to AEI data, absenteeism fell modestly (to ~23.5%) in recent years, but still hovers well above the ~15% pre-COVID benchmark.

• Some districts are improving, but many are not on pace to return to pre-pandemic norms, especially in high-poverty or urban settings. The 74 Million

Why Does It Persist?

Schools and researchers cite multiple interlocking causes:

1. Habits and norms shifted during the pandemic
   Some students and families adapted to looser structures, remote learning flexibility, or more lenient attendance enforcement, making reentry to rigid in-class

How Are U.S. Public Schools Doing in 2025?

As we move through 2025, U.S. public schools face a mix of pressures, opportunities, and evolving expectations. In many places, the aftershocks of the COVID-19 era remain visible in student learning, staffing, and finances. Meanwhile, new forces—like artificial intelligence, shifting enrollment patterns, and political debates over curriculum—are reshaping how parents, educators, and policymakers view public education. This article updates the landscape for 2025, offering insight into fresh data, emerging trends, and ongoing challenges in U.S. public schools.

Enrollment and Demographics: A Changing Landscape

According to the 2025 Condition of Education report, 49.5 million students were enrolled in public elementary and secondary schools in fall 2023—the latest official figure. That number remains below the 50.8 million level recorded before the pandemic, reflecting a longer-term decline in enrollment.Projections by NCES suggest continued modest decline into 2025.

Among key demographic shifts:

• The national student-to-teacher ratio in 2025 is estimated at 15:1.

• School districts continue to become more diverse in student racial and ethnic composition, though significant gaps remain in representation and resources.

• Some states, especially in parts of the Rust Belt, rural South, and inland West, show sharper drops in K–12 enrollment, compounding financial stress for their districts. mgt.us

• Districts in fast-growing regions (Sun Belt,

How Parents Can Prepare for the Public School Parent Interview (Yes, It Matters)

When applying for a coveted seat in a public school—whether through a magnet, lottery, or neighborhood boundary assignment—many families focus exclusively on preparing the child: their grades, test scores, and extracurricular résumé. Butncreasingly, public schools value the “parent interview” (or parent meeting) as part of the admissions process. Yes, it matters—and your preparation can make a difference in how the school perceives your commitment, fit, and capacity to partner.

In 2025, we’re seeing more public districts adopt holistic processes that include parent engagement. This article provides a step-by-step guide to help you prepare confidently, answer thoughtfully, and present your family in the best possible light.

Why the Parent Interview Matters in Public School Admissions

A parent interview isn’t just a procedural step—it’s a window into your values, communication style, expectations, and ability to partner with the school. For administrators, this meeting offers insight into:

• Your understanding of and alignment with the school’s mission

• How you support your child’s learning at home

• How you handle challenges, conflicts, or changes

• Whether your expectations are realistic and sustainable

In competitive public school admissions (such as magnet, charter, or selective-enrollment districts), some schools use the parent interview to differentiate among otherwise-equivalent applicants. The parent’s professionalism, attitude,

Gifted & Talented Programs in Public Schools: Opportunities and Controversies

The conversation around gifted & talented programs in public schools continues to evolve in 2025, marked by expanding opportunities, deepening critiques, and fresh policy experiments. For parents, educators, and policymakers alike, the challenge is to balance the promise of accelerated, enriched learning with the demands of fairness, inclusivity, and sustainability.

This article surveys the landscape of gifted & talented (G&T) programming in public education, highlighting its benefits, controversies, and emerging trends. It aims to equip readers with a clear understanding of both the opportunities and the trade-offs involved in identifying and serving gifted learners in the public system.

What Are Gifted & Talented Programs?

Since the 1970s, the notion of giftedness has been broadly framed as high potential in intellectual, creative, leadership, or specific academic domains. The landmark Marland Report offered one of the earliest federal definitions, advocating that gifted learners need services beyond what the general classroom offers (Wikipedia).

In practice, U.S. public school systems deploy multiple models:

• Pull-out programs or resource rooms: Gifted students leave the mainstream class temporarily for specialized enrichment.

• Cluster grouping: Several gifted students are assigned to the same regular classroom, with the teacher differentiating instruction (Wikipedia).

• Separate gifted classrooms or tracks: Entire classes are composed of identified gifted learners, following accelerated or enriched curricula.

STEM in Public Schools: How to Evaluate Programs in Your District

STEM—science, technology, engineering, and mathematics—is more than a buzzword. In 2025, high-quality STEM programs in public schools are critical for preparing students for a future in which AI, data, and engineering will increasingly shape industries. But not all STEM offerings are created equal. As a parent, educator, or community stakeholder, you’ll want to know how to evaluate the strength, equity, and impact of these programs in your district.

This article provides a structured framework for evaluation, grounded in recent trends and expert guidance, to help you ask the right questions—and advocate for excellence.

Why Quality STEM Matters in 2025

First, a quick reality check: demand for STEM skills continues to rise. STEM jobs are projected to grow around 10.4 % between 2023 and 2033, roughly three times faster than non-STEM jobs.

Meanwhile, the 2025 trends in STEM education show a sector in flux: schools are wrestling with integrating generative AI responsibly, strengthening the STEM teacher pipeline, and ensuring equitable access to advanced coursework.

In this context, evaluating your district’s STEM offerings is not a luxury—it’s a necessity.

Key Pillars for Evaluating a STEM Program

To evaluate STEM in your public school district, examine the program across five interrelated dimensions: